Some people believe that the government should provide
financial assistance to artists such as painters, musicians and poets. Others
think that it is a waste of money.
Discuss both points of view and give your opinion.
The first essay is Argument-led, meaning that both sides of the issue are equally mentioned.
The second essay is Thesis-led, meaning that the writer takes a strong viewpoint and only briefly mentions the opposing view.
Both are excellent examples of a Task 2 essay and would receive Band 9 scores.
For more information about Thesis-led and Argument-led essays, please see the previous post.
The first essay opposes government support of the arts, while the second essay supports it. Which one do you agree with?
Essay 1
There are
differing opinions about whether the government should give financial assistance
to artists or not. Although there are valid arguments to be made in support of
government arts patronage, it is my belief that the arts should be primarily supported
not by the government, but by private enterprise.
There is no doubt
that artistic pursuits are worthwhile. Playing music, painting, sculpting or
even simply viewing art can have therapeutic effects on people, helping them to
relax and express themselves. Arts education is especially beneficial for
children and helps them develop creativity, which will integral to their
success in later life. Additionally, I believe that public art projects such as
statues and murals can help to beautify urban areas and could be partly funded
by government grants.
These arguments
aside, I would like to assert that spending tax money on art and artists is
wasteful, as there are countless other sectors in desperate need of government
funding. For example, even in highly developed countries, there are people who
are unable to meet basic needs like food and shelter. Many thousands of people
die every year from diseases that could be easily cured. Furthermore, the
governments of many countries have not yet addressed the important issues
surrounding environmental protection and clean energy. Surely, meeting these
requirements is far more important than promoting art, despite all its merits.
In an ideal world, there would always be plenty of revenue for all of a countries needs as well as its wants. Until that time comes, however, I believe that the government should focus on solving the aforementioned health and environmental issues and leave the funding of creative projects to motivated individuals and private enterprises.
In an ideal world, there would always be plenty of revenue for all of a countries needs as well as its wants. Until that time comes, however, I believe that the government should focus on solving the aforementioned health and environmental issues and leave the funding of creative projects to motivated individuals and private enterprises.
Words: 281
There are
differing opinions about whether the government should give financial assistance
to artists or not. Some people believe that the government has a responsibility
to help support the arts, while others believe that this is a wasteful
practice. I wholeheartedly believe that patronage of the arts is fundamental to
the role of government, and that it benefits each and every member of society.
Expressing oneself
creatively is a human need that is not unlike our basic needs for acceptance
and love. We have been writing songs and drawing on the walls of caves since
the dawn of our species. Although creating art is arguably less important than
food or shelter, it remains something that all people have a right to enjoy and
participate in, and so we should not balk at using tax dollars to support it.
Providing government money for artistic endeavours ensures that all people can take
part, regardless of their financial means.
Another important
point is that arts education for children is an absolutely essential part of
their development, and should be publicly promoted. Children who learn to be
creative today can become the inventors, designers, and innovators of tomorrow.
It has been proven, for example, that young people who learn to play a musical
instrument early in life will achieve higher scores in mathematics and have an
easier time learning new languages when they grow up. Additionally, people who
develop creative outlets at an early age tend to be better at dealing with
stress as adults.
In sum, the
benefits of publicly supporting the arts go far beyond mere aesthetic
appreciation. It is our duty as a society to support the arts along with the
rest of our human requirements.
Words: 284
excellent
ReplyDeletesuper
ReplyDeleteVarangaOfficial - варанга в аптеке цена спб - только достоверные и проверенные факты. Воспользовавшись нашим сайтом, вы получите возможность узнать обстоятельную информацию об этом лекарственном средстве. Увидеть данные о проведенных клинических исследований, прочитать реальные отзывы пациентов и врачей. Ознакомиться с инструкцией по применению, прочесть об особенностях и методах работы мази, уяснить, почему крем Варанга настолько эффективен, где нужно заказывать оригинальный препарат и, как избежать покупки подделки. Мы очень тщательно проверяем размещаемые данные. Предоставляем посетителям нашего онлайн-ресурса сведения, которые берутся только из подлинных источников. Если вы обнаружили у себя признаки грибкового поражения стоп или же долго и безрезультатно пытаетесь избавиться от этого коварного, неприятного недуга, наш сайт покажет вам быстрый и легкий способ устранения проблемы. Присоединяетесь и живите здоровой полноценной жизнью. Мы собрали ответы на все вопросы на одном информационном ресурсе.
ReplyDelete